culturaeducatie

โ€ž๐‹๐ข๐›๐ž๐ซ๐ญ๐š๐ญ๐ž, ๐ž๐ ๐š๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐š๐ญ๐ž, ๐Ÿ๐ซ๐š๐ญ๐ž๐ซ๐ง๐ข๐ญ๐š๐ญ๐žโ€ – ๐๐ข๐š๐ฅ๐จ๐  ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐œ ๐ฌฬ—๐ข ๐ข๐๐ž๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐ญ๐š๐ซ ๐ขฬ‚๐ง ๐’๐š๐ฅ๐š ๐”๐ง๐ข๐ซ๐ข๐ข

รŽn ambianศ›a solemnฤƒ a Sฤƒlii Unirii din Alba Iulia, รฎn dimineaศ›a de ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ“ ๐ง๐จ๐ข๐ž๐ฆ๐›๐ซ๐ข๐ž ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ“, s-a desfฤƒศ™urat ๐ฌ๐ข๐ฆ๐ฉ๐จ๐ณ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฎ๐ฅ โ€ž๐‹๐ข๐›๐ž๐ซ๐ญ๐š๐ญ๐ž, ๐ž๐ ๐š๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐š๐ญ๐ž, ๐Ÿ๐ซ๐š๐ญ๐ž๐ซ๐ง๐ข๐ญ๐š๐ญ๐žโ€, o manifestare care a reunit nume marcante ale mediului academic romรขnesc ศ™i internaศ›ional.

Evenimentul, organizat de ๐‚๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ฎ๐ฅ ๐‰๐ฎ๐๐ž๐ญฬ—๐ž๐š๐ง ๐€๐ฅ๐›๐š, ๐Œ๐ฎ๐ณ๐ž๐ฎ๐ฅ ๐๐š๐ญฬ—๐ข๐จ๐ง๐š๐ฅ ๐š๐ฅ ๐”๐ง๐ข๐ซ๐ข๐ข ๐€๐ฅ๐›๐š ๐ˆ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ข๐š ศ™i ๐‚๐ž๐ง๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐ฅ ๐๐ž ๐‚๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐šฬ† โ€ž๐€๐ฎ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐ง ๐๐ž๐ง๐šโ€, รฎn parteneriat cu ๐Œ๐š๐ซ๐ž๐š ๐‹๐จ๐ฃ๐šฬ† ๐๐š๐ญฬ—๐ข๐จ๐ง๐š๐ฅ๐šฬ† ๐๐ข๐ง ๐‘๐จ๐ฆ๐šฬ‚๐ง๐ข๐š ศ™i ๐€๐ฌ๐จ๐œ๐ข๐š๐ญฬ—๐ข๐š ๐‡๐จ๐ซ๐ž๐š, a propus o incursiune รฎn istoria ideilor, a curentelor identitare ศ™i a personalitฤƒศ›ilor ce au jalonat destinul Romรขniei moderne.

Deschiderea oficialฤƒ a avut un moment de o profunzime aparte: ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐จ๐ง๐š๐ซ๐ž๐š ๐ข๐ฆ๐ง๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ข ๐ง๐š๐ญฬ—๐ข๐จ๐ง๐š๐ฅ ๐š๐ฅ ๐‘๐จ๐ฆ๐šฬ‚๐ง๐ข๐ž๐ข ๐ฅ๐š ๐ง๐š๐ข, รฎn interpretarea lui ๐€๐ฅ๐ž๐ฑ๐š๐ง๐๐ซ๐ฎ ๐๐š๐ฅ, discipol al Maestrului Gheorghe Zamfir.

Sonoritatea ancestralฤƒ a instrumentului, rezonรขnd รฎn bolศ›ile monumentale ale sฤƒlii, a conferit ceremoniei o aurฤƒ de sacralitate la intersecศ›ia dintre tradiศ›ie, memorie ศ™i emoศ›ie naศ›ionalฤƒ.

รŽn continuare, รฎn numele partenerilor instituศ›ionali, a luat cuvรขntul ๐Œ๐š๐ซ๐ž๐ฅ๐ž ๐Œ๐š๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ ๐š๐ฅ ๐Œ๐š๐ซ๐ข๐ข ๐‹๐จ๐ฃ๐ข ๐๐š๐ญฬ—๐ข๐จ๐ง๐š๐ฅ๐ž ๐๐ข๐ง ๐‘๐จ๐ฆ๐šฬ‚๐ง๐ข๐š, ๐.๐‘.๐…๐ซ. ๐‚๐šฬ†๐ญ๐šฬ†๐ฅ๐ข๐ง ๐“๐จ๐ก๐šฬ†๐ง๐ž๐š๐ง๐ฎ, care a subliniat atรขt semnificaศ›ia temei alese, cรขt ศ™i importanศ›a dialogului dintre istorie, valori ศ™i construcศ›ia civicฤƒ modernฤƒ. Prezenศ›a sa a conferit evenimentului o deschidere simbolicฤƒ spre zona reflecศ›iei etice ศ™i iniศ›iatice care a marcat modernitatea europeanฤƒ.

รŽntregul simpozion a fost moderat cu profesionalism ศ™i echilibru de ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐œ๐ฎ๐ฅ ๐“๐ฎ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐‘๐จ๐ฌฬ—๐ฎ, ๐๐ข๐ซ๐ž๐œ๐ญ๐จ๐ซ ๐š๐๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ง๐œ๐ญ ๐š๐ฅ ๐Œ๐ฎ๐ณ๐ž๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ข ๐๐š๐ญฬ—๐ข๐จ๐ง๐š๐ฅ ๐š๐ฅ ๐”๐ง๐ข๐ซ๐ข๐ข ๐€๐ฅ๐›๐š ๐ˆ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ข๐š, care a ghidat intervenศ›iile, a structurat dialogul ศ™i a menศ›inut dinamica academicฤƒ รฎntr-un ritm coerent ศ™i accesibil.

Prima intervenศ›ie, susศ›inutฤƒ de ๐€๐œ๐š๐. ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐Ÿ. ๐ฎ๐ง๐ข๐ฏ. ๐๐ซ. ๐ˆ๐จ๐š๐ง-๐€๐ฎ๐ซ๐ž๐ฅ ๐๐จ๐ฉ – ๐๐ซ๐ž๐ฌฬ—๐ž๐๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐ž๐ฅ๐ž ๐€๐‚๐€๐ƒ๐„๐Œ๐ˆ๐„๐ˆ ๐‘๐Ž๐Œ๐€ฬ‚๐๐„, a oferit o reinterpretare a figurii lui Horea prin prisma istoriografiei lui David Prodan. Discursul a subliniat complexitatea personalitฤƒศ›ii liderului transilvฤƒnean, recuperรขndu-l nu doar ca simbol al dreptฤƒศ›ii sociale, ci ca exponent al unei conศ™tiinศ›e politice timpurii, ce anunศ›a trezirea naศ›iunii romรขne.

๐๐ซ๐จ๐Ÿ. ๐ฎ๐ง๐ข๐ฏ. ๐๐ซ. ๐ˆ๐จ๐š๐ง ๐๐จ๐ฅ๐จ๐ฏ๐š๐ง, ๐๐ข๐ซ๐ž๐œ๐ญ๐จ๐ซ ๐š๐ฅ ๐ˆ๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ข ๐๐ž ๐ˆ๐ฌ๐ญ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ž โ€ž๐†๐ž๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐ž ๐๐š๐ซ๐ข๐ญฬ—๐ข๐ฎ” ๐š๐ฅ ๐€๐‚๐€๐ƒ๐„๐Œ๐ˆ๐„๐ˆ ๐‘๐Ž๐Œ๐€ฬ‚๐๐„, a continuat prin a pune รฎn dialog destinele lui Horea ศ™i ale รฎmpฤƒratului Iosif al II-lea, evidenศ›iind complementaritatea lor istoricฤƒ: unul reprezentant al aspiraศ›iilor populare, celฤƒlalt promotor al reformismului luminat. Prelegerea a reliefat procesul prin care ideile modernitฤƒศ›ii politice au pฤƒtruns รฎn spaศ›iul transilvฤƒnean, accelerรขnd cristalizarea sentimentului naศ›ional.

Tema Romรขniei รŽntregite ศ™i a autodeterminฤƒrii naศ›ionale a fost aprofundatฤƒ de ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐Ÿ. ๐ฎ๐ง๐ข๐ฏ. ๐๐ซ. ๐‚๐šฬ†๐ญ๐šฬ†๐ฅ๐ข๐ง ๐“๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฅ๐ข๐ฎ๐œ, ๐๐ข๐ซ๐ž๐œ๐ญ๐จ๐ซ ๐š๐ฅ ๐ˆ๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ข ๐๐ž ๐ˆ๐ฌ๐ญ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ž ,,๐€. ๐ƒ. ๐—๐ž๐ง๐จ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฅ” ๐ˆ๐š๐ฌฬ—๐ข ๐š๐ฅ ๐€๐‚๐€๐ƒ๐„๐Œ๐ˆ๐„๐ˆ ๐‘๐Ž๐Œ๐€ฬ‚๐๐„, care a analizat evoluศ›ia gรขndirii politice romรขneศ™ti รฎn secolul al XIX-lea ศ™i รฎnceputul secolului XX. รŽn centrul reflecศ›iei sale s-a aflat asociativismul fraternaliศ™tilor, o componentฤƒ adesea ignoratฤƒ a discursului unionist, dar esenศ›ialฤƒ pentru รฎnศ›elegerea mecanismelor ce au fฤƒcut posibil momentul 1918.

Dimensiunea internaศ›ionalฤƒ a simpozionului s-a reflectat รฎn prezentarea lui ๐€๐ฅ๐ž๐ฑ๐š๐ง๐๐ซ๐ฎ ๐‘๐ฎ๐Ÿ๐š๐ง๐๐š, ๐ƒ๐š๐ญ๐š๐›๐š๐ฌ๐ž ๐€๐๐ฆ๐ข๐ง๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐š๐ญ๐จ๐ซ ๐”๐†๐‹๐„, ๐ซ๐ž๐ฉ๐ซ๐ž๐ณ๐ž๐ง๐ญ๐š๐ง๐ญ ๐š๐ฅ „๐“๐ก๐ž ๐–๐จ๐ซ๐ฌ๐ก๐ข๐ฉ๐Ÿ๐ฎ๐ฅ ๐’๐จ๐œ๐ข๐ž๐ญ๐ฒ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐…๐ซ๐ž๐ž ๐Œ๐š๐ฌ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ” – ๐‹๐จ๐ง๐๐ซ๐š. Acesta a examinat raporturile dintre regalitatea romรขnฤƒ ศ™i francmasonerie, explorรขnd influenศ›ele culturale ศ™i diplomatice pe care masoneria le-a avut รฎn consolidarea monarhiei constituศ›ionale romรขneศ™ti.

๐ˆ๐ฌ๐ญ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐œ๐ฎ๐ฅ ๐‚๐ซ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐š๐ง ๐Œ๐จ๐ฌฬ—๐ง๐ž๐š๐ง๐ฎ, ๐ฆ๐ž๐ฆ๐›๐ซ๐ฎ ๐š๐ฅ ๐œ๐จ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฌ๐ข๐ž๐ข ๐๐ž ๐ˆ๐ฌ๐ญ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ž ๐Œ๐š๐ฌ๐จ๐ง๐ข๐œ๐šฬ† ๐š๐ฅ ๐Œ๐š๐ซ๐ข๐ข ๐‹๐จ๐ฃ๐ข ๐๐š๐ญฬ—๐ข๐จ๐ง๐š๐ฅ๐ž ๐๐ข๐ง ๐‘๐จ๐ฆ๐šฬ‚๐ง๐ข๐š, a รฎncheiat sesiunea de comunicฤƒri cu o amplฤƒ radiografie a rolului Reginei Maria รฎn dialogul dintre stat, culturฤƒ ศ™i miศ™cฤƒrile spiritual-iniศ›iatice ale epocii. A rezultat un portret poliedric al suveranei, surprinsฤƒ ca personalitate vizionarฤƒ, mediator cultural ศ™i voce femininฤƒ cu impact internaศ›ional.

Simpozionul โ€žLibertate, egalitate, fraternitateโ€ s-a dovedit a fi o meditaศ›ie asupra prezentului ศ™i viitorului, propunรขnd o lecturฤƒ maturฤƒ a valorilor care structureazฤƒ identitatea romรขneascฤƒ. ๐ˆฬ‚๐ง๐ญ๐ซ๐ž ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ž, ๐œ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐šฬ† ๐ฌฬ—๐ข ๐ฌ๐ข๐ฆ๐›๐จ๐ฅ, ๐ž๐ฏ๐ž๐ง๐ข๐ฆ๐ž๐ง๐ญ๐ฎ๐ฅ ๐š ๐ซ๐ž๐ข๐ญ๐ž๐ซ๐š๐ญ ๐ข๐๐ž๐ž๐š ๐œ๐šฬ† ๐ฆ๐ž๐ฆ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐š ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ๐ž ๐ฎ๐ง ๐š๐œ๐ญ ๐๐ž ๐ซ๐ž๐ฌ๐ฉ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐š๐›๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐š๐ญ๐ž, ๐ข๐š๐ซ ๐œ๐ฎ๐ง๐จ๐š๐ฌฬ—๐ญ๐ž๐ซ๐ž๐š ๐ฎ๐ง ๐ ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐ž ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐ง๐ฎ๐ข๐ญ๐š๐ญ๐ž.

Lasฤƒ un rฤƒspuns

Adresa ta de email nu va fi publicatฤƒ. Cรขmpurile obligatorii sunt marcate cu *